As president, I cannot look at the well-being of American citizens any other way. The Paris climate agreement is simply the latest example of the Washington agreement that disadvantages the United States for the exclusive good of other countries and leaves American workers – whom I love – and taxpayers to absorb costs in the form of lost jobs, lower wages, closed factories and very low economic output. Risks are increasing because, historically, these agreements only become ambitious over time. In other words, the Paris framework is a starting point, no matter how bad, it is not an end point. And the exit from the agreement protects the United States from future violations of U.S. sovereignty and from any future massive legal liability. Believe me, we have a massive legal responsibility if we continue to do so. Although the United States and Turkey are not parties to the agreement, as they have not indicated their intention to withdraw from the 1992 UNFCCC, they will continue to be required, as an “Annex 1” country under the UNFCCC, to end national communications and establish an annual inventory of greenhouse gases.  INDIA has addressed the challenges of eradicating poverty while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. About 24% of the world`s population without access to electricity (304 million) lived in India.
Nevertheless, the country planned to “reduce the intensity of its GDP emissions by 33-35% by 2030” from 2005 levels. The country has also attempted to buy about 40% of its electricity from renewable energy sources, not fossil fuels by 2030. INDC found that implementation plans would not be affordable from national resources: it estimated that it would take at least $2.5 trillion to implement climate change measures by 2030. India would achieve this through the transfer of technology (transfer of capacity and equipment from the most developed countries to less developed countries [LDCs]) and international funding, including support from the Green Climate Fund (an end-to-end investment support program in low-emission technologies and the development of populations vulnerable to the effects of climate change). With the Paris agreement, Turkey has a strange beef that stems from its decision to sign the agreement as a developed country. On the other side of the debate are the head of the environmental protection agency, Scott Pruitt, a virulent anti-climate extremist, and chief strategist Steve Bannon, widely known for shaping the president`s nationalist views and fueling his distrust of international agreements. Since the Kyoto Protocol came into force, the Clean Development Mechanism has been criticized because, in most cases, it has not brought significant emission reductions or benefits for sustainable development.  It has also suffered from low prices from Certified Emission Reductions (REFs), which has reduced project demand. These criticisms have motivated the recommendations of various interest groups who, through working groups and reports, have provided new elements that they hope to see in the MDS that will support their success.  Details of the governance structure, the terms of the project proposal and the comprehensive approach should be detailed at the conference of the parties to be held in Marrakech in 2016.[must update] The authors of the agreement have set a withdrawal period that President Trump must follow – which prevents him from irreparably harming our climate.